Review



lenti guide mcherry plasmid  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc lenti guide mcherry plasmid
    Lenti Guide Mcherry Plasmid, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 13 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lenti guide mcherry plasmid/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 13 article reviews
    lenti guide mcherry plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    86
    Sangon Biotech orf2 gene encoding ducv cap
    Orf2 Gene Encoding Ducv Cap, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/orf2 gene encoding ducv cap/product/Sangon Biotech
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    orf2 gene encoding ducv cap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Biotechnology Information orf2 gene
    Orf2 Gene, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/orf2 gene/product/Biotechnology Information
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    orf2 gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc lenti guide mcherry plasmid
    Lenti Guide Mcherry Plasmid, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lenti guide mcherry plasmid/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lenti guide mcherry plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc genome wide sgrna library
    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry <t>sgRNA.</t> K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.
    Genome Wide Sgrna Library, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/genome wide sgrna library/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    genome wide sgrna library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    85
    Rockland Immunochemicals line 1 orf2
    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry <t>sgRNA.</t> K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.
    Line 1 Orf2, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/line 1 orf2/product/Rockland Immunochemicals
    Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    line 1 orf2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    85/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    85
    Rockland Immunochemicals anti line 1 orf2
    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry <t>sgRNA.</t> K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.
    Anti Line 1 Orf2, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti line 1 orf2/product/Rockland Immunochemicals
    Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti line 1 orf2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    85/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Biotechnology Information orf2 gene sequence
    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry <t>sgRNA.</t> K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.
    Orf2 Gene Sequence, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/orf2 gene sequence/product/Biotechnology Information
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    orf2 gene sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Addgene inc pac cr7t grna2 1 nlsbfp
    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry <t>sgRNA.</t> K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.
    Pac Cr7t Grna2 1 Nlsbfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pac cr7t grna2 1 nlsbfp/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pac cr7t grna2 1 nlsbfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry sgRNA. K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: CRISPR‐MI and scRNA‐Seq Reveal TREM2's Function in Monocyte Infiltration and Macrophage Apoptosis During Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202412227

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Development of in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR Cas9 screen for monocyte infiltration (CRISPR‐MI). A) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM labeled with VivoTrack680 fluorescent dye. B,C) The aortae from recipient mice in (A) were isolated and underwent in vivo imaging (n = 4). Scale bar = 1 cm. D) Flowchart of the adoptive transfer of BMDM from mTmG mice. E,F) The aortae from recipient mice in (D) were digested and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). G, BMDMs were infected with lentivirus encoding EGFP (lenti‐EGFP, 50 MOI) 48 h after isolation with different adjuncts. 22 h after infection, cells were imaged by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. H) BMDMs in (G) were analyzed by flow cytometry to quantify EGFP+ cells (n = 3). I) BMDMs, were infected with lenti‐EGFP at different time points (0, 24, 48, 72 h) after isolation with or without F108. EGFP + cells were quantified by flow cytometry (n = 3). J) Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were used as the BMDM donor, and the LentiGuide Cherry lentivirus vector was used to carry sgRNA. K) BMDMs from Rosa26‐Cas9 Tg mice were infected with lentivirus carrying different sgRNAs (50 MOI) 48 h after isolation. 72 h after infection, the genome editing efficiency was determined by CRISPR‐Seq. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐test was used for C, F. * , p < 0.05. CD, chow diet; WD, Western diet; AngII, angiotensin II; Tg, transgenic.

    Article Snippet: We used the genome‐wide sgRNA library (Mouse Cherry Brie Pooled Library, from Addgene Pooled Library #170511) [ ] to perform the genome‐wide CRISPR knockout screen.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Genome Wide, CRISPR, Adoptive Transfer Assay, Labeling, Isolation, In Vivo Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Infection, Microscopy, Plasmid Preparation, Western Blot, Transgenic Assay

    CRISPR‐MI identified genes regulating monocyte infiltration in the murine AAA model. A) Flowchart of CRISPR‐MI. B) Number of sgRNA and corresponding genes identified by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) in BMDM donor and aorta, heart, and liver from recipient mice. C) Heat plot showing the Pearson correlation coefficient of gRNA counts from different organs and biological replicates. D) Principal component analysis gRNA counts from different organs and biological replicates. E) Scatter plots comparing gRNA targeting genes in aorta versus gDNA in donor BMDMs. Red dots indicated significantly enriched genes in the aorta. F) Scatter plot of overrepresented pathways of genes enriched in the aorta by GSEA.

    Journal: Advanced Science

    Article Title: CRISPR‐MI and scRNA‐Seq Reveal TREM2's Function in Monocyte Infiltration and Macrophage Apoptosis During Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development

    doi: 10.1002/advs.202412227

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPR‐MI identified genes regulating monocyte infiltration in the murine AAA model. A) Flowchart of CRISPR‐MI. B) Number of sgRNA and corresponding genes identified by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) in BMDM donor and aorta, heart, and liver from recipient mice. C) Heat plot showing the Pearson correlation coefficient of gRNA counts from different organs and biological replicates. D) Principal component analysis gRNA counts from different organs and biological replicates. E) Scatter plots comparing gRNA targeting genes in aorta versus gDNA in donor BMDMs. Red dots indicated significantly enriched genes in the aorta. F) Scatter plot of overrepresented pathways of genes enriched in the aorta by GSEA.

    Article Snippet: We used the genome‐wide sgRNA library (Mouse Cherry Brie Pooled Library, from Addgene Pooled Library #170511) [ ] to perform the genome‐wide CRISPR knockout screen.

    Techniques: CRISPR, Next-Generation Sequencing